BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Friday, June 8, 2018

Blackouts in “The Gin Closet” vs. “The Recovering” by Leslie Jamison (post 2): The novel uses “blackouts” in ways that suggest multiple personality

In my previous post, on Jamison’s nonfiction book, The Recovering: Intoxication and Its Aftermath (2018), I noted its failure to ask whether some alcoholics might also have “dry blackouts”: memory gaps for periods of time when they had not been intoxicated.

An alcoholic who had both wet and dry blackouts would probably have both alcoholism and multiple personality.

So I planned to read Jamison’s novel, The Gin Closet (2010), for comparison.

I am halfway through the novel, which has two main characters, Stella and her aunt, Tilly, who are first-person narrators of alternate chapters. Blackouts have been mentioned by both characters.

Tilly is a severe alcoholic, who has been known to drink gin in a closet, literally. Her blackouts—“One morning I woke up on the bathroom floor. I couldn’t even remember how I’d gotten there” (1, p. 81)—are explicitly during times of intoxication.

Stella describes herself as psychologically split into multiple parts: “I was just organized into little sections inside. The sections didn’t touch each other, necessarily. I hadn’t seen some of them for a long time” (1, p. 21).

She, too, has had blackouts, but when she mentions them—“Blackouts took moments of my life and hid them from my sight” (1, p. 121)—it is when telling the story of her history of anorexia nervosa, a story in which she does not mention intoxication.

So Stella has had “dry blackouts”: memory gaps without intoxication, which are the kind that are typical of multiple personality.

Of course, a person with multiple personality can have both kinds of blackouts if they have both drinking and nondrinking personalities.

Tilly’s blackouts, which do occur during intoxication, nevertheless raise the possibility of multiple personality, because her drinking behavior is so peculiar. She drinks in the closet of a place where she lives alone.

What could explain such odd behavior? [I can only speculate:] It might be the behavior of a drinking, alternate personality, who originated in childhood (multiple personality starts in childhood), when Tilly might have started her drinking in a closet, so her mother wouldn’t see it.

1. Leslie Jamison. The Gin Closet. New York, Free Press, 2010.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.