BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Friday, July 20, 2018


“The Liars’ Club” (post 4) by Mary Karr (post 8): Memoir’s previously blanked-out revelation was a memory gap, typical of multiple personality  

At the end of this memoir, Mother’s unspecified mental illness is supposedly explained by this revelation: Many marriages ago, Mother’s husband at that time had taken their two children, Tex and Belinda, and disappeared. And when Mother eventually found them, she did not avail herself of legal authority to regain custody, because she felt she could not provide a good home as a single parent.

Her many subsequent marriages reflected her hope of establishing a stable home, so that she could take her children back. But due to mental instability and bad luck, that never happened. And she had kept those children a secret from her later children, Mary Karr and sister.

But why did Mother’s first husband suddenly disappear with their two children? And why, when she found them, did she not ask that question? Had Mother already been mentally ill and dangerous? Indeed, was her mental illness the cause, not the effect, of the abandonment? And was her mental illness of a kind in which she usually looked normal, especially in public, leading her husband to fear that he could never convince a judge otherwise?

Her history of having many subsequent marriages has diagnostic significance in distinguishing between a psychosis like schizophrenia and a dissociative neurosis like multiple personality disorder. It is only the latter in which the person would be sufficiently socially engaging to have all those relationships.

Memory Gap
As discussed in past posts, Karr explicitly says that she has a tendency to blank things out from her memory (i.e., have memory gaps, a cardinal symptom of multiple personality). The matter of her mother’s first two children is another example: Karr had been told about those two half-siblings when she was seven, many years before the end-of-memoir revelation, when she was twenty-five. But she had blanked out the memory, which she, herself, found hard to explain:

“…two extra kids who’d appeared from a pocket in Grandma’s apron were unfathomable. This doesn’t completely explain my blanking out Tex and Belinda, though, because usually you could convince me of anything” (1, p. 80).

“The Liars’ Club” Title
The regular gathering of her father and his friends to trade tall tales, which Karr calls “The Liars’ Club,” is not a big enough event in this memoir to explain why she made it the title.

Perhaps she thinks that writers of memoirs belong to a liars’ club. After all, how can they know the whole truth about themselves if they blank things out?

1. Mary Karr. The Liars’ Club (A Memoir). New York, Viking, 1995.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.