BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Sunday, December 16, 2018


“Motherless Brooklyn” by Jonathan Lethem (post 3): Protagonist’s Tourette’s, unlike the real thing, involves an alternate personality

As Lethem has said (see previous post), his protagonist’s Tourette Syndrome (of muscular and vocal tics) was intended to express certain aspects of Lethem’s creative process.

And since Lethem did research on real Tourette’s, then anything attributed to his protagonist’s Tourette’s, but which is not true of real Tourette’s, would be true of Lethem.

In real Tourette’s, the person experiences an intense urge, analogous to an intense itch, for which the tic is like a good scratch. In real Tourette’s, the urge to say or do something is not prompted by a “Tourette’s self” or an “invisible companion,” and it is not “intentional” (which would imply some person-like intelligence who had the intention).

So since the following is not true of real Tourette’s, it must, in some sense, be true of Lethem:

“Not now, I begged my Tourette’s self. Think about it later” (1, p. 22).

“…an invisible companion named Billy or Bailey was begging for insults I found it harder and harder to withhold…and I couldn’t let anyone else or myself know how intentional my craziness felt” (1, pp. 46-47).

A “Tourette’s self,” an “invisible companion,” and a secret “intentional” intelligence are euphemisms for an alternate personality.

1. Jonathan Lethem. Motherless Brooklyn. New York, Doubleday, 1999.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.