BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Sunday, April 14, 2019


“Labrador” by Kathryn Davis: First fifty pages of praised novel raise questions about narration and characters not raised in book reviews

The first-person narrator, Kathleen (“Kitty”), begins her story when she is five and her sister, Willie, is nine. Kitty is telling the story, not to the reader, but to “you,” who is Willie.

Kitty tells how she became aware of Rogni, a male angel, whom only she could hear and see, and whose existence she had never revealed to Willie until now (the telling of this story). The two young sisters live with their parents, but Kitty sometimes likes to imagine that the sisters are orphans. Both sisters are portrayed as children who readily tell lies (1).

Why is Kitty addressing the narrative to her sister rather than the reader? And since Kitty depicts herself as a child who imagines things that are not true (like a fire when there is no fire), is she imagining Willie and Rogni? And are Willie and Rogni Kitty’s imaginary companions or alternate personalities?

Reviewers don’t wonder about these things (2,3,4,5) and maybe I won’t either by the time I finish the novel.

1. Kathryn Davis. Labrador. New York, Farrar Straus Giroux, 1988.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.