BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Sunday, June 30, 2019

“Enduring Love” by Ian McEwan (post 7): Why does explicitly psychiatric novel ignore symptoms of multiple personality in two characters?

As previously noted, this novel concludes with a fictitious article from a fictitious journal of psychiatry that discusses this novel from a psychiatric point of view, as if the characters were real people. It is the author’s own psychiatric analysis of this novel.

The author’s psychiatric analysis ignores symptoms suggestive of multiple personality in two major characters: the protagonist saw himself from a distance, and the villain addressed an “invisible presence” (see prior posts).

Evidently, the author did not see these as psychiatric symptoms. Why?

Because these may be the kinds of things that he, himself (and other people who may have multiple personality trait) might experience, and he (and those others) are not crazy.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.