BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Sunday, July 28, 2019


“The Mysteries of Pittsburgh” by Michael Chabon (post 4): Protagonist has a memory gap, but it causes no problem and seems unrelated to anything

On pages 214-239 (1), the protagonist finally has sex with his male lover, his girlfriend finds out about it, the protagonist says he loves both of them, and the three of them have at least a temporary falling out.

Coincidentally, on page 212, just before all that, is the novel’s first mention of the protagonist’s having a memory gap: “I swallowed half a beer without noticing. Cleveland [a male friend, but not his lover] and I were both dazed, though his daze was a kind of nervous reverie, whereas mine was more akin to a torpor. When I finally remarked the pale bread flavor of the beer in my mouth, I looked around the bar and did not remember having come in” (1).

Nothing further is made of his memory gap for having come in to the bar. He has never had a memory gap previously in this novel, drinking or not drinking. The men are in a “daze,” which is not a typical word for intoxication. The memory gap is treated as a trivial detail, mentioned in passing. Why, then, is this cardinal symptom of multiple personality included?

I have only what the first-person narrator says, and since he does not connect it to anything specific, neither can I. All I can say is that something involving alternate personalities is evidently going on.

You can see from this episode why memory gaps are rarely complained about or spontaneously mentioned by persons who are being evaluated by a psychiatrist or other interviewer. Most memory gaps seem to the person to have occurred for no particular reason, cause no particular problem, and are forgotten about, unless you specifically inquire about them.

1. Michael Chabon. The Mysteries of Pittsburgh. New York, Harper Perennial, 1988/2005.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.