BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Saturday, August 3, 2019

“Camino Island” by John Grisham: Are novelists lying who say they depend on their characters to help write the story?

I am two-thirds through this novel, one of whose main characters is a novelist. Mercer Mann has published a respectable first novel, but for the last five years, she has had writer’s block.

The narrator says that “Writers are generally split into two camps: those who carefully outline their stories and know the ending before they begin, and those who refuse to do so upon the theory that once a character is created he or she will do something interesting” (1, p. 135).

The narrator implies that Mercer has been taking the second approach, and that is the reason she has been getting nowhere for the last five years.

In an interview on this novel, the interviewer poses the above dichotomy of the fiction-writing process, and Grisham says of authors who don’t outline and who say they depend on their characters, “I think they’re lying” (2).

Is Grisham being sensitive about his being a commercial, bestselling novelist, and expressing defensive anger toward the literary elite, or does he really think the idea that character and narrative personalities seem to have minds of their own, and contribute to the story, is a lie? Does he really think that his fellow novelists who claim it are lying? I don’t think so, for three reasons.

First, his character, Mercer Mann, had evidently used the non-outlining, character-dependent approach to write her moderately successful first novel.

Second, in his video interview, Grisham says that the reason he started to create detailed outlines before writing a novel was not that he had been unable to fill blank pages otherwise, but that he had produced too many manuscript pages. He says he had had to discard hundreds of pages, once wasting a year of his life that way. So it’s possible that narrative and character personalities had actually contributed to his writing process, but that their contributions had been undisciplined.

Third, one of Grisham’s friends in real life, someone he greatly admires, is his fellow novelist, Stephen King. Indeed, he is envious of King for being even more prolific than he is. And in past posts, I have quoted King as acknowledging his own debt to his character and muse, alternate personalities, for the writing of his stories.

However, one thing that King emphasizes is that he has to “prune” the stories that his characters provide. And I suspect that Grisham accomplishes the same thing with his outlines.

1. John Grisham. Camino Island. New York, Doubleday, 2017.
2. NC Bookwatch, PBS Video, August 3, 2017. https://www.pbs.org/video/john-grisham-camino-island-vtsdet/

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.