BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Wednesday, October 9, 2019


“Imaginary Friend” by Stephen Chbosky (post 6): Novel ends with virgin pregnancy

The novel ends with a cliff-hanger (suggesting a sequel). Mary Katherine is a young woman who is pregnant (verified by multiple pregnancy tests), but claims never to have had sexual intercourse (her sincerity about this, even in her own private thoughts, is described at great length). And the last lines of the novel are as follows:

“Mary Katherine…,” the sweet voice said. “You are having a Son” (1, pp. 705-706).

Yes, the last word of the novel, “Son,” spoken by a mysterious voice in her head, is capitalized (implying an analogy to Jesus).

I think it more likely that Mary Katherine has amnesia, a memory gap, for impregnation, because sexual intercourse was engaged in by an alternate personality (with whom her regular personality is not co-conscious).

In conclusion, in spite of the novel’s pervasive symptoms of multiple personality—voices, namelessness, puzzling inconsistency in characters’ behavior, dissociative fugue and memory gap—there is no indication that the author intended to depict multiple personality, per se. So the symptoms may reflect aspects of the author’s own psychology.

1. Stephen Chbosky. Imaginary Friend. New York, Grand Central Publishing, 2019.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.