BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Monday, December 7, 2020

Alexandre Dumas’ Three Writing Personalities, named by Function and Race (Post 15): Poems on Yellow Paper, Articles on Pink Paper, Fiction on Blue Paper


Dumas’ color-coded manuscripts have earned him a place in a book of famous authors who have odd writing habits (1). It is unusual for an author to write manuscripts on a particular color of paper, other than white, depending on whether it is a poem, an article, or fiction.


As an example of Dumas' attitude, it is told how once when traveling, “he had run out of his precious supply of blue paper. For decades Dumas had been using that particular color to pen all of his fiction. He was ultimately forced to settle for a cream stock, though he felt that color change negatively impacted his fiction” (1, p. 21).


It might not have occurred to me that Dumas’ color-coding had anything to do with multiple personality, except that I’ve previously discussed Doris Lessing, the Nobel Prize-winning novelist. Her autobiography (Volume One) makes it clear that she had multiple personality. And her most famous novel, The Golden Notebook (1962), features a writer with multiple personality, who has four, different color, notebooks.


The Golden Notebook is divided into five sections, separated by four, different color, Notebooks—Black, Red, Yellow, and Blue—all four written by one character, a novelist. Lessing said that this divided structure represented the “fragmentation” and “compartmentalisation” of identity. 


Furthermore, the novel provides evidence that the notebooks represent four alternate personalities: each Notebook had been written in a different handwriting, even though they were all written by the same person (indicative of different personalities in multiple personality).


I don’t know if there are any handwriting differences in Dumas’ manuscripts, but the color differences suggest that Dumas’ writing was done by three alternate personalities, each represented by its different color.


Perhaps Dumas thought of Poetry, Articles, and Fiction as being persons of different literary races.


1. Celia Blue Johnson. Odd Type Writers: From Joyce and Dickens to Wharton and Welty, the Obsessive Habits and Quirky Techniques of Great Authors. New York, Perigee/Penguin, 2013. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.