BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Wednesday, December 16, 2020

“Tom Jones” by Henry Fielding (post 3): “And this, as I could not prevail on any of my actors to speak, I myself was obliged to declare,” the narrator says.


In Part I, Book III, Chapter VII, titled “In which the author himself makes his appearance on the stage,” the nameless narrator advises the reader that “hereafter in this history,” Tom Jones is going to have serious problems “to which, it must be confessed, the unfortunate lad, by his own wantonness, wildness, and want of caution, too much contributed…”


The lesson: “It is not enough that your designs, nay, that your actions, are intrinsically good; you must take care they shall appear so…And this precept, my worthy disciples, if you read with due attention, you will, I hope, find sufficiently enforced by examples in the following pages…


“And this [precept], as I could not prevail on any of my actors to speak, I myself was obliged to declare” (1, pp. 121-123).


Comment

Many people, reading the above, think that the author is joking, because they assume that characters are puppets that will say whatever the author wants.


But this author—like many other authors I have quoted from interviews and essays—says that his characters are not like puppets, but more like willful actors, who have minds of their own.


In short, the fiction writer’s important characters are imaginary people who seem to have minds of their own, which are alternate personalities (who may cooperate, but sometimes won’t).


1. Henry Fielding. [The History of] Tom Jones [A Foundling] [1749]. Edited by John Bender and Simon Stern. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.