BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Thursday, February 11, 2021

“Native Speaker” by Chang-rae Lee (post 2): Four more clues to the possibility of multiple personality in the protagonist


Extraordinary Memory

The memory gaps of multiple personality—occurring when one personality doesn’t remember what happened when another personality had been in control—may be especially surprising to discover, if you ask a person about this, because persons with multiple personality may, generally, have extraordinarily good memory, as does the protagonist:


“I was always good at memory games, and as a boy I annoyed my father by beating him if he slipped just once. But now…my memory is fantastic, near diabolic. It arrests whatever appears before my eyes. I don’t memorize anymore. I simply see” (1, p. 178).


Mirror Doubles

As discussed in many past posts, persons with multiple personality may sometimes see alternate personalities when they look in a mirror.


“When I was young I’d look in the mirror and address it, as if daring the boy there; I would say something dead and normal, like, ‘Pleased to make your acquaintance,’ and I could barely convince myself that it was I who was talking” (1, p. 180).


“My Alter Identity”

In discussing his work as a spy, in which he would have to use a false identity, the protagonist refers to “my alter identity” (1, p. 181). His use of the word “alter,” the standard abbreviation for alternate personality in the multiple personality literature, raises the possibility that the author had been interested in reading about multiple personality. “My alter identity” suggests he might have been interested in understanding himself.


Inconsistent Life History

One reason to suspect multiple personality is if a person gives an inconsistent life history, which may be due to different personalities remembering things differently.


The protagonist had once spied on a psychoanalyst by becoming his patient. In the course of presenting his life history to the psychoanalyst, “Inconsistencies began to arise in crucial details, all of which I inexplicably confused and alternated” (1, p. 181), which you wouldn’t expect in a person who had an extraordinarily good memory (see above), unless different personalities were telling different stories.


1. Chang-rae Lee. Native Speaker. New York, Riverhead/Penguin, 1995/1996. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.