“Native Speaker” by Chang-rae Lee (post 4): Protagonist is both traitor to, and lover of, immigrants, in novel’s split personality ending
The protagonist says that in his work as a spy, since he betrayed a Korean-American politician and got other immigrants deported, “My ugly immigrant’s truth…is that I have exploited my own, and those others who can be exploited. This forever is my burden to bear…Here is the sole talent I ever dared nurture” (1, pp. 319-320).
Later, in heart-warming contrast, he assists his wife, Lelia, who is a speech therapist and teacher of English-as-a-second-language to young immigrant children. He says, “I like my job. I wear a green rubber hood and act in my role as the Speech Monster. I play it well. I gobble up kids but I cower when anyone repeats the day’s secret phrase, which Lelia has them practice earlier” (1, p. 348).
And at the end of the class, in the last line of the novel, she says good-bye to each child by name, “taking care of every last pitch and accent, and I hear her speaking a dozen lovely and native languages, calling all the difficult names of who we are” (1, p. 349).
Thus, the protagonist has a split, self-contradictory attitude, which may be a clue to multiple personality (search “self-contradictory”). Did the author have a profound sociological/psychological insight? Or is this how he happened to find the character and story in the dark caves of his mind? From what he once said about his writing process, it appears to be the latter: “Lee has compared his writing process to spelunking” (2, 3).
In conclusion, the features of multiple personality noted in this and prior posts appear to be another example of “gratuitous multiple personality,” which is when a novel has features of multiple personality that were probably not intended as such, but are probably in the novel only as a reflection of the psychology of the author.
1. Chang-rae Lee. Native Speaker. New York, Riverhead/Penguin, 1995/1996.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.