BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Wednesday, April 21, 2021

Schizophrenia in “The Man Who Lived Underground” according to “Memories of My Grandmother” (author’s essay) by Richard Wright (post 5)


In my previous four posts on Richard Wright’s classic African-American novel, Native Son (1) (search “native son”), I found that the protagonist, Bigger Thomas, has unacknowledged multiple personality (a dissociative disorder, not a psychosis like schizophrenia).


In contrast, the protagonist of Richard Wright’s novel, The Man Who Lived Underground (2), has schizophrenia (a psychosis), according to the author:


“I’d like to go into detail on this point, for in the writing of The Man Who Lived Underground, this kinship of insanity and religion intrigued me more, perhaps, than anything else. As I wrote page after page I was reminded of many psychiatric case histories of schizophrenic personalities. More and more, as the story progressed, I felt the writing to be a good emotional description of schizophrenia…First, I noticed that Fred Daniels was withdrawn from the world; second, that he suffered a loss of contact with reality in a hard and sharp sense; third, that there was a gradual disintegration of his personality. Yet, while noticing this, I also noticed that this whole idea of a man withdrawing from the world had a striking similarity to the life of my grandmother, who, in her religious life, was certainly withdrawn from the world as much as anybody has ever been withdrawn from it…[Although] my grandmother was surely a sane woman…that is, she was adjusted to her environment…[she] heard voices; she imagined things, too. I imagine that the reason no one ever called her crazy was that everyone who lived around her was acting more or less the same way. When I, in my childhood, told my grandmother that I could not see things or hear voices, I was branded the crazy one in the environment” (2, pp. 201-204).


1. Richard Wright. Native Son [1940]. New York, Harper Perennial Modern Classics, 2005.

2. Richard Wright. The Man Who Lived Underground [written 1942] and Memories of My Grandmother [written 1942]. New York, Library of America, 2021.


Added same day: Richard Wright was an advocate for mental health services in Harlem (New York) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lafargue_Clinic


No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.