BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Sunday, May 16, 2021

“Everything I Don’t Remember” by Jonas Hassen Khemiri (post 2): Award-winning Swedish bestseller with unacknowledged multiple personality


This novel is “Winner of the August Prize, Sweden’s Most Prestigious Literary Honor” (front cover). The prize (1) is named after August Strindberg, discussed in past posts (search “Strindberg”).


The novel builds a case—memory gaps and alternate personalities—that the protagonist has had multiple personality since childhood:


“When he [Samuel, the protagonist] was seven he would come home from a birthday party and be absolutely amazed that he couldn’t recall what flavor of ice cream he had eaten that afternoon” (2, p. 25).


“…there were many times I told him stuff that he didn’t seem to remember three weeks later” (2, p. 34).


“He looked surprised, as if the words [he had just spoken] had come from a place [an alternate personality?] he didn’t have total control over” (2, p. 100).


“Mostly we talked about memory…He told me he [Samuel] had a friend with a photographic memory…[In contrast,] I [Samuel] make lists. Samuel…pulled out a notebook…Everything I need to remember” (2, p. 118-119).


“I started wondering who Samuel really was…Did I even know his true self?…Because I noticed how quickly he switched from one personality to the next, and the more I noticed it the more obvious it became that the version I knew was just one of many” (2, pp. 201-202).


Comment

Combining Samuel’s memory gaps with his “friend’s” photographic memory, you have the subtitle of this blog. Perhaps the author has an excellent memory with meaningful memory gaps.


The above quotations make a case for multiple personality, whose two main diagnostic criteria are alternate personalities and memory gaps.


Typical of most novels, it is not labeled as such and is unacknowledged.


In conclusion, as the novel’s front flap says: “Everything I Don’t Remember is a…tale about…memory. But it is also a story about a writer [investigator of Samuel’s death] who, by filling out the contours of Samuel’s story, is actually trying to grasp a truth about himself” (2, front flap).


1. Wikipedia. “August Prize.”

2. Jonas Hassen Khemiri. Everything I Don’t Remember [2015 in Swedish]. Translated from Swedish by Rachel Willson-Broyles. New York, ATRIA Books, 2016. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.