BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Wednesday, May 5, 2021

Pearl Buck (1892-1973)—“The Good Earth” (1931), Pulitzer Prize (1932), Nobel Prize in Literature (1938)—had recurrent memory gaps


“Forgetfulness was a useful mechanism for Pearl, a discipline she worked at from her earliest years until it became instinctive. ‘I have the habit of forgetting what I do not care to remember,’ she wrote toward the end of her life. Her autobiography is full of references to canceled or obliterated episodes, nearly always periods of anxiety and disruption that led to major turning points. She forgot what happened after her family’s expulsion from Zhenjiang in the summer of the Boxer uprising—‘for the next few months, I think it was almost a year, my memory falters’—just as she forgot the second great uprooting ten years later when she left for college: ‘My memories of China suddenly dim on that day we left our compound.’ She blanked out her unhappiness at Randolph Macon (‘Of my college days I remember shamefully little’)…(1, p. 164).


“Her novels, like her life, incorporate a kind of ongoing amnesia. The reassurance they convey comes in part from both knowing and not knowing where the bodies are buried, simultaneously acknowledging and denying realities too painful to face directly” (1, p. 240).


“Memory for Pearl was an intensely creative faculty. It opened and closed like quicksand over fragments of the past, absorbing and transforming them, sucking them down only to disgorge them once again as much as ten or twenty years later in fictional or nonfictional form, sometimes in both one after the other” (1, p. 246).


Search “memory gaps” for past discussions of this recurrent topic.


1. Hilary Spurling. Pearl Buck in China: Journey to “The Good Earth.” New York, Simon & Schuster Paperbacks, 2010/2011.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.