BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Sunday, July 18, 2021

“The Mandarins” by Simone de Beauvoir (post 1): Four quotes from first half of novel


Wikipedia Synopsis

The Mandarins is a 1954 roman à clef by Simone de Beauvoir, for which she won the Prix Goncourt, awarded to the best and most imaginative prose work of the year. The book follows the personal lives of a close-knit group of French intellectuals from the end of World War II to the mid-1950s. The title refers to the scholar-bureaucrats of imperial China. The characters at times see themselves as ineffectual ‘mandarins’ as they attempt to discern what role, if any, intellectuals will have in influencing the political landscape of the world after World War II. As in Beauvoir's other works, themes of feminism, existentialism, and personal morality are explored as the characters navigate not only the intellectual and political landscape but also their shifting relationships with each other…In her autobiography de Beauvoir denies that The Mandarins is a roman à clefand says that the characters are are not exactly like herself, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Albert Camus (1).


Four Quotes

“It’s preposterous, the liberties one takes with the characters in a novel…If you look closely enough, every character in a novel is a monster, and all art consists in preventing the reader from looking too closely” (2, p. 156).


“…a gentle ecstatic voice inside him would whisper that the book he was writing would be good and that nothing in the world was more important” (2, p. 21).


“But a voice settled in Henri’s breast and kept repeating, ‘The daughter did, too.’ And all through the afternoon, it kept repeating that refrain” (2, p. 372).


“It’s true that Dubreuilh is a split personality. But I’m surprised to see you criticizing him for that; I am like him, you know” (2, p. 337).


Comment

In nonpsychotic persons, voices may be from alternate personalities. When the Sartre and Camus characters are explicitly said to have a “split personality” (an informal term for multiple personality), it may be meant either as a joke or as a matter-of-fact observation.


1. Wikipedia. “The Mandarins.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mandarins

2. Simone de Beauvoir. The Mandarins [1954]. Translated by Leonard M. Friedman. Introduction by Doris Lessing [1993]. London, Harper Perennial, 2005. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.