William James in “Varieties of Religious Experience” (post 3) on “Pilgrim’s Progress” John Bunyan (post 5)
“He [John Bunyan] was a typical case of the psychopathic temperament, sensitive of conscience to a diseased degree, beset by doubts, fears and insistent ideas and victim of verbal automatisms, both motor and sensory. These were usually texts of Scripture which, sometimes damnatory and sometimes favorable, would come in a half-hallucinatory form as if they were voices, and fasten on his mind and buffet it between them like a shuttlecock. Added to this were a fearful melancholy, self-contempt, and despair…” (1, p. 176).
“For years together he was alternately haunted with texts of Scripture, now up and now down, but at last with an ever growing relief in his salvation through the blood of Christ…” (1, p. 207).
“Bunyan became a minister of the gospel, and in spite of his neurotic constitution, and of the twelve years he lay in prison for his non-conformity, his life was turned to active use. He was a peacemaker and a doer of good, and the immortal Allegory which he wrote has brought the very spirit of religious patience home to English hearts” (1, p. 208).
Comment
William James (1842-1910) is famous as both a philosopher (Pragmatism) and psychologist. One of his psychological interests was cases of multiple personality, which led him to this conclusion: “The same brain may subserve many conscious selves, either alternate or coexisting…” (2, p. 401). But in his brief discussion of Bunyan in his book on religious experience, he does not raise that issue.
However, James’ discussion of Bunyan is notable for this combination: a person with a basically “neurotic [nonpsychotic] constitution” has “half-hallucinatory [pseudopsychotic]…voices.” It is a combination suggestive of multiple personality.
1. William James. The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature [1901-1902]. New York, The Modern Library, 1994.
2. William James. The Principles of Psychology [1890]. Volume One. New York, Dover Publications, 1950.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.