BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Tuesday, April 23, 2024

Interesting Past Post

Novelists Zadie Smith (2) and George Saunders (3) Say Writers and Readers have Multiplicities 


George Saunders: I was thinking about something I heard you [Zadie Smith] say recently, about multiplicity. That meant a lot to me. When I think about what fiction does morally, I’m happier thinking of a person full of multiplicities—sort of fragmented. Maybe you could even think 100,000 people are inside each human being. And you drop a novel on that person, and a certain number of those sub-people come alive or get reenergized for some finite time. It’s maybe for just a few days even, depending on the book. Although there are books that I read years ago that enlivened things in me that haven’t died yet.


Zadie Smith: I think we understand this experience more from being readers than writers.


George Saunders: Yes, that’s right. I remember reading The Bluest Eye when I was a young parent, and something opened in me. That’s the highest aspiration. So A Christmas Carol  [which they had mentioned because it has ghosts like Saunders’ 2017 award-winning novel Lincoln in the Bardo] would enliven a certain subset of those 100,000 internal people” (1, p. 175). “Like you [Zadie Smith], I have multiplicities” (1, p. 181).


Comment: Their opinions are apparently based on their own subjective experience. They suggest that readers of novels, like writers of novels, are more likely to have multiple personality trait than the average person.


1. Michael O’Connell (Editor). Conversations with George Saunders. Jackson, University Press of Mississippi, 2022

2. Wikipedia. “Zadie Smith.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zadie_Smith

3. Wikipedia. “George Saunders.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Saunders 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.