BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

MPD Textbooks: — Frank W. Putnam, MD. Diagnosis and Treatment of Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD) (a.k.a. Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), New York, The Guilford Press, 1989. —James G. Friesen, PhD. Uncovering the Mystery of MPD, (includes discussion of demonic possession) Eugene, Oregon, Wipf and Stock Publishers,1997.

Monday, October 27, 2025

“Lying in State: Why Presidents Lie — And Why Trump is Worse” by Eric Alterman


“Chapter 16: Donald Trump’s License to Lie


“In the spring of 2019, the Washington Post fact-checking team reported that President Trump made the 10,000th “false or misleading claim” of his presidency, according to the paper’s own ongoing database. It happened 828 days into his term, and the Post editorial page called it “a whopper.” The editors explained, “The president, whose own administration imposed and then rescinded a systematic policy of wrenching migrant children from their parents, with no protocol in place to reunite them, now poses as a paragon of compassion that ended cruel laws in place before he took office. This is false” (1, p. 241).


“Trump told that bald-faced lie during a live televised interview by phone with his private advisor and public cheerleader, Sean Hannity of Fox News. It was his predecessors, George W. Bush and Barack Obama, he insisted, who had begun the child separation policy. His administration was blameless: “We’ve been on a humane basis….[W]e go out and stop the separations.” But as the Post editors pointed out, Trump had indeed instituted the policy, and in “an act of singular cruelty,” had done so without making any meaningful effort to ensure the eventual return of those children to their parents or to see to their mental, physical, and emotional health. Many of the children were held in cages. As for his predecessors alleged responsibility, Trump’s own Justice Department had proudly called his policy “new” when announcing it. With his policy and the lies he told about it, Trump, not atypically, “fused inhumanity with incompetence,” in the Post editors’ words, while hiding behind a facade of apparent cluelessness about his own administration’s actions” (1, pp. 241-242).


1. Eric Alterman. Lying in State: Why Presidents Lie —And Why Trump is Worse. New York, Basic Books, 2020.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.