BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Saturday, September 5, 2015

The Novelist’s Creative Process: How can you learn anything from interviews, essays, and memoirs, if that isn’t the personality who writes the novels?

We know from Margaret Atwood’s nonfiction book on writing (see past post) and Henry James’s short story “The Private Life” (see past post) that the novelist’s nonfiction/social/host personality is not the personality who writes the novels. So how can you learn much about a novelist’s creative process from their interviews and nonfiction?

In past posts, I have criticized interviewers, because, for example, when novelists mention hearing the voices of their characters, interviewers never pursue it, never ask to be told more about these auditory hallucinations.

But maybe interviewers have asked such questions in the past, found the novelist had nothing more to say—didn’t know anything more or felt the interview was getting too personal—and so now they no longer ask. Or maybe interviewers think that anyone who hears voices is crazy, and they fear that if you ask about their voices, they might have a breakdown.

I can’t give advice that would work with all novelists. But in regard to novelists’ hearing voices when they are immersed in their writing process, I would suggest that the interviewer, politely and gently, stay with the issue, even if it is making the host personality a little uncomfortable. After five or ten minutes, the host personality may be replaced by a personality who is happy to talk about it. (To get a switch back to the regular personality, all you have to do is change the focus of discussion back to mundane issues.)

As to novelists’ nonfiction writings—essays, journals, memoirs, letters—these can be informative if a literary novelist is confession-minded, psychologically-minded, and/or prolific.

Why prolific? In a limited conversation with a person who has multiple personality, you are likely to be talking to only the host personality. But the longer you talk to a person who has multiple personality, the greater the chance that an alternate personality will come out. And a prolific writer is like a person who is having a very long conversation. Also, they may be prolific, in part, because they have more cowriters.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.