BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Tuesday, December 29, 2015

Harold Pinter (post 2): Why were his plays like Old Times difficult for even him to understand? Because he wrote in multiple reality, the perspective of multiple personality?

In his Nobel Prize lecture, Pinter says, “There are no hard distinctions between what is real and what is unreal, nor between what is true and what is false. A thing…can be both true and false…there never is any such thing as one truth to be found in dramatic art…

“Most of my plays are engendered by a line, a word or an image…The first line of Old Times is ‘Dark.’ I had no further information…[but soon I saw] “A man…and a woman…Who are they talking about? But I then see, standing at the window, a woman…her hair dark.

“It’s a strange moment…characters who up to that moment have had no existence. What follows is fitful, uncertain, even hallucinatory…The author…is not welcomed by the characters…You certainly can’t dictate to them…people with an individual sensibility of their own…you are unable to change, manipulate or distort…” (1, pp. 18-20).

Three Interpretations of Old Times (via Wikipedia)

“One interpretation of the play is that all three characters were at one time real living people. Deeley met Anna first and slept with her, then [he] later met Kate… Deeley began dating Kate, and Kate…killed Anna…and Kate then killed him, too. Once he was dead, Kate's mind took over…She has lived the past 20 years in a fictional world where Anna and Deeley love her instead of each other.

“Another interpretation is that Kate and Anna are different personalities of the same person, Kate being the prominent one…Deeley cried…when he discovered Kate's mental issue…Kate "killed" Anna for Deeley's sake. 20 years later, she tells him that Anna is returning, and he does all he can to keep Kate from allowing Anna back into her life, ultimately succeeding by the end of the play, when Kate kills Anna again by recalling the first time she killed her.

“A third interpretation is that the whole play takes place in Deeley's subconscious id. Kate is, in fact, not Deeley's wife but a representation of the cold, distant mother whom he could woo but never please. Anna represents complete sexual freedom—but to his consternation, although Anna seems to be attracted to him at first, she turns out to be wearing Kate's underwear and is much more interested with Kate than with Deeley. Kate awards Deeley one rare smile, which she refuses to bestow on Anna, and then proceeds to "kill" both Anna and Deeley with her words. Deeley, realizing he is indeed the "odd man out", is reduced to a sobbing little boy, but Kate still won't comfort him.

“During rehearsals for a Roundabout Theatre Company production in 1984, Anthony Hopkins, who starred, asked Pinter to explain the play's ending. Pinter responded, "I don't know. Just do it” (2).

1. Harold Pinter. “Art, Truth and Politics” (2005), in Nobel Lectures: 20 Years of the Nobel Prize for Literature Lectures. Cambridge UK, Icon Books, 2007.
2. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Times

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.