BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Saturday, September 3, 2016

Three Contradictions in “The Road Not Taken” by Robert Frost: He may have had two narrative voices or alternate personalities who disagreed.

Three Contradictions

First, the title of the poem emphasizes the road NOT taken, but the poem itself emphasizes the road that IS taken.

Second, contrary to what most readers assume, the poem does NOT say that the traveler came to a fork in the road. No, there were TWO ROADS. So the traveler must already have been on one of the two roads.

Third, the best-known contradiction, is that both roads are said to have been equally worn, yet one is then claimed to have been less traveled, which makes no sense.

Cynical Interpretation

It could be argued that the poet prioritized beautiful language, poetic structure, and rhyme over meaning and common sense.

Multiple Narrator Interpretation

Another possibility is that Robert Frost had two narrative voices or alternate personalities who collaborated in the writing of this poem, and that these two narrators had contradictory views, which is evident in the result.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.