BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Thursday, March 2, 2017

“The Color Purple” by Alice Walker (post 2): Naming Male Characters with Honorifics, but No Surnames, highlights Male Dominance in Jim Crow South.

Most male characters in this novel are given honorifics:
“Mr. __________”
“Mayor ________”
“Reverend Mr. _______”

Since the setting of this novel is the pre-civil rights, Jim Crow South, the meaning of honorifics—who gets them and who does not—is explained by Jim Crow Etiquette:

“Whites did not use courtesy titles of respect when referring to Blacks, for example, Mr., Mrs., Miss., Sir, or Ma’am. Instead, Blacks were called by their first names. Blacks had to use courtesy titles when referring to Whites, and were not allowed to call them by their first names” (1).

Thus, the naming of male characters, even black male characters, with honorifics serves to highlight and emphasize male social dominance. Omitting their surnames, it might be argued, only serves to make the honorifics stand out.

But was it really necessary to omit their surnames?

No, it was not necessary. And as I have argued in past posts, regarding other novels, namelessness of characters is probably indicative of the author’s multiple personality. But as I am only halfway through this novel, I reserve further comment.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.