BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Monday, February 12, 2018


“V.” by Thomas Pynchon (post 3): Herbert Stencil’s Illeism (third-person self reference) and the novel’s multiple narratives are due to multiple personality.

The Epilogue is about the last days of Herbert Stencil’s father, Sydney Stencil, who is involved with a woman whose name starts with “V.”

But what I found most interesting, even startling, about the epilogue is the sudden appearance of a character named Stencil (the father) who refers to himself in the first person. Previously, throughout the novel, Herbert Stencil had always and unerringly referred to himself in the third person (which you could probably not do, no matter how hard you tried).

The reader has not been told at what age Herbert started to refer to himself in the third person, but the reader is told that he had experienced a change in personality at age 38: “it was as if a stranger, located above the frontiers of consciousness, were shaking him” (1, p. 43).

Moreover, to sustain his new “animateness,” “he had to hunt V,” because if he didn’t, he would go “back into half-consciousness” (1, p. 44); that is, revert to his previous personality.

So what is the search for “V”? It is the animating preoccupation of an alternate personality, who is called “a stranger,” probably because he did not identify with the regular personality or call himself “Herbert Stencil” (and so would refer to the latter as someone else, by using the third person).

In addition to Herbert Stencil’s illeism (third-person self-reference), the other unusual feature of this novel is that it seems less like one novel, and more like several novellas, which I guess is due to Pynchon’s having several narrative personalities.

1. Thomas Pynchon. V. [1963]. New York, Bantam Books, 1984.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.