BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Monday, February 26, 2018


“Independence Day” by Richard Ford (post 2): Frank Bascombe thinks 15-year-old son is having emotional problems due to conflict between “two selves”

Richard Ford’s Independence Day won the Pulitzer Prize and PEN/Faulkner, becoming the first novel ever to win both awards in a single year.

In Chapter One, the first-person narrator, Frank Bascombe, who is divorced, is concerned that his son, Paul, who lives with his remarried mother, is having serious problems: shoplifting and assault. Frank plans to spend father-son time with Paul on the Independence Day, 4th of July, holiday.

Frank’s formulation of the psychological basis for his son’s problems includes the following:

“…one little outer character tries to make friends with or exert control over another, submerged, one, but can’t” (1, p. 14).

“My fatherly job…to coax by some middleman’s charm his [son’s] two foreign selves, his present and his childish past, into a better, more robust and outward-tending relationship—like separate, angry nations seeking one government—and to sponsor self-tolerance as a theme for the future” (1, p. 15).

This would be a sound, therapeutic approach to stabilize multiple personality. Is Frank basing his formulation and solution of his son’s problems on his own personal experience? Are these issues a reflection of the author’s?

1. Richard Ford. Independence Day. New York, Alfred A. Knopf, 1995.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.