BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Friday, June 15, 2018


“Less” by Andrew Sean Greer (post 3): Nameless first-person narrator knows many things he could not possibly know about the protagonist 

The first-person narrator, who is nameless until the end of the novel, knows innumerable things about what Arthur Less thinks and does that only Arthur Less, himself, could have known. Thus, the narrator is grossly implausible.

It is a mystery, then, why the novel was written this way. The key to the mystery may be the first-person narrator’s namelessness (for most of the novel).

In the author’s creative process, the narrative voice was probably a nameless alternate personality, since multiple personality is where you find both namelessness and imaginative stories. But editorial opinion may have considered a nameless narrator inappropriate for this type of novel. So another character was given the narrative credit, even though it didn’t make sense (because that character had no way of knowing all that he knew).

Why haven’t most readers objected to such an obviously implausible narrator?

They give the novel the benefit of the doubt, because it is otherwise so well written. Plus the character given credit for the narration is part of a happy ending. And love trumps logic.

Andrew Sean Greer. Less [2017]. New York, Back Bay Books, 2018.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.