BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Wednesday, August 1, 2018


“The Psychopathology of Everyday Life” by Sigmund Freud: Freud’s alternate personality breaks ink pot without damaging more precious objects

“It is very rare for me to break anything…Shortage of space in my study has often forced me to handle a number of pottery and stone antiquities…in the most uncomfortable positions, so that onlookers have expressed anxiety that I should knock something down and break it. That however has never happened. Why then did I once dash the marble cover of my plain ink pot to the ground so that it broke?…my sweeping movement was only apparently clumsy; in reality it was extremely adroit and well-directed, and understood how to avoid damaging any of the more precious objects that stood around” (1, pp. 167-168).

Freud focuses his analysis on his motivation for breaking his ink pot (he concludes that he hoped to get a new one as a gift), but he fails to address who broke it, which is a question, since he, himself, had no memory of deciding to break it, and had no memory of guiding his hand so adroitly that he broke nothing else.

A decision to break the ink pot must have been made, and his hand must have been guided, by an intelligence of some sort, but Freud’s regular intelligence had no memory for making that decision or guiding his hand.

Freud would call his alternate intelligence his “unconscious,” but it was unconscious only from the point of view of his regular consciousness.

Freud’s problem was that his model of the mind did not allow for multiple consciousness and alternate personalities. He acknowledged that such cases had been observed and did exist—and it has been pointed out that some of Freud’s own patients probably had it—but Freud, himself, never made the diagnosis. The closest he came to recognizing the dissociation of a personality was probably his colleague’s patient, Anna O.

Freud had a blind spot for multiple personality, possibly because he, himself, had the trait, and his self-analysis was incomplete.

(Search “Freud” for previous posts.)

1. Sigmund Freud. The Psychopathology of Everyday Life [1901]. Translated from the German by Alan Tyson. Edited by James Strachey. New York, WW Norton, 1965.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.