BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Sunday, November 18, 2018

“A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man” by James Joyce (post 7): Will the novel explain and justify its title?

I have just begun this novel, which Joyce worked on for more than ten years, and I wonder about its title.

Why does it say “the” artist rather than “an” artist? Is there only one kind of art and one kind of artist? Does the title claim that the portrait of Stephen Dedalus is in some important sense the portrait of all artists?

And why “A Portrait” rather than just “Portrait”? The former would seem to imply that different, but valid, portraits of Stephen Dedalus would have been possible. Indeed, the word “portrait” itself would seem to imply that different artists would have painted Dedalus differently.

Is “the” artist male, or only “an” artist?

I think that when most people read Joyce’s title and don’t see any problem, it is because they are translating it into The Story of Stephan Dedalus as a Young Man. But that is not Joyce’s title.

Perhaps the novel itself will explain the way its title is worded.

1. James Joyce. A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man [1916]. Edited by Jeri Johnson. Oxford University Press, 2000/2008.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.