BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Thursday, December 13, 2018

“Experience” by Martin Amis (post 7): Memoir includes letters written by his “persona” named “Osric,” who he is said to have felt was not at all like him

Memoir’s Index
Osric:
—as MA [Martin Amis] persona, 15, 17, 34, 110, 119, 131, 153, 167n, 173n, 191n, 231n, 239, 240n
—letters from, 9-11, 19-21, 37-38, 55-57, 74-75, 86-88, 107-9, 126-27, 150-51, 173-74, 193-94, 212-13, 231-33, 250-51, 270-72” (1, p. 398).

As you can see from the memoir's index, Amis documents his “persona” at great length.

But he does not explain it.

The clearest comment I can find is the following:

Persona Disavowed
“In Martin Amis’s memoir, Experience, he includes verbatim reproductions of letters he sent as a teenager and young man, primarily to his father, to add depth to his own character and to provide an interesting dual-track narrative, which runs parallel to the more conventional course of the book. He confesses fairly early on in his contemporary account that the letters were written by a person he does not recognise, someone who is not even perceptibly him – though this could of course be the product of reflexive embarrassment at observing his youthful precocity after all of the years which had passed…

“He terms this personality ‘Osric’, after the simpering, jejune courtier in Hamlet…” (2).

1. Martin Amis. Experience. New York, talk miramax/Hyperion, 2000.
2. James Snell. “The Experience of Martin Amis.”
https://jamespetersnell.wordpress.com/2016/05/22/the-experience-of-martin-amis/

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.