BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Tuesday, May 28, 2019


“As I Lay Dying” by William Faulkner (post 13): The multiple-narrator structure reflects how Faulkner’s alternate personalities were organized

Some readers of this novel are in awe of how brilliantly Faulkner juggled fifteen narrators. Other equally intelligent readers are driven up a wall.

My opinion is that he wrote it this way because it came natural to him. It was a reflection of how his alternate personalities were organized.

But if it was just a reflection of his multiple personality, and most fiction writers have multiple personality, why aren’t all novels like this? Two reasons.

First, there are narrative fashions and degrees of permissiveness that vary with the era and culture.

Second, different people with multiple personality have different systems of personalities. The most obvious difference is that some multiples (people with multiple personality) have many personalities (dozens to thousands), while others have two to twelve. Some multiples have a few powerful personalities, while others have many different realms, each with its own organization. In short, each multiple’s system of personalities is unique.

People play the hand they were dealt. (Some play it better than others.)

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.