BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Friday, January 22, 2021

“Villette” (post 2) by Charlotte Brontë (post 14): Metaphor, Word Choice, and Multiple Personality; “Faculties” may mean her Alternate Personalities


During Lucy Snowe’s brief first visit to London, she has interesting ways of thinking when she is by herself; interesting, that is, if you assume, as I do, that Brontë’s metaphor and choice of words were meaningful to her.


Common-sense as a Personality

“Into the hands of Common-sense I confided the matter. Common-sense, however, was as chilled and bewildered as all my other faculties, and it was only under the spur of an inexorable necessity that she spasmodically executed her trust. Thus urged, she paid the porter: considering the crisis, I did not blame her too much that she was hugely cheated…” (1, p. 46).


She says, “I said” while alone (to whom?)

“I did well to come,” I said, proceeding to dress with speed and care. “I like the spirit of this great London which I feel around me. Who but a coward would pass his whole life in hamlets, and for ever abandon his faculties to the eating rust of obscurity” (1, p. 48).


But four pages later, she says “I reflected” and “this thought was crossing my mind” (1, p. 52). That is, when she experiences herself as having her own thought, she says so. Which raises the question as to whom she experiences herself as talking, when, by herself, she says “I said.”


Comment

Is “Common-sense” the name Brontë has given to one of her alternate personalities? And when she is alone, but says rather than thinks something, is she speaking to an alternate personality? And is “faculties” her euphemism for alternate personalities? If, as most great fiction writers, Brontë had multiple personality trait, the answers are probably yes.


1. Charlotte Brontë. Villette [1853]. Edited by Margaret Smith and Herbert Rosengarten. Introduction and Notes by Tim Dolan. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000/2008. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.