BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Saturday, May 1, 2021

“Blaze” (post 3) by Richard Bachman (Stephen King) (post 18): Blaze recognizes his multiple personality and that his George personality may harm baby


“He didn’t trust George with the baby. He didn’t know why, but he sure didn’t. Because, see, now George was a part of himself, and he most likely took all the parts with him when he went somewhere, even the George part. Didn’t that make sense? Blaze thought it did” (1, p. 150).


“He couldn’t leave the baby with George again. It was like George was jealous, or something. Almost like George wanted to—


The baby reacts to a switch from the Blaze to the George personality:


“He might have stiffened, because Joe [the baby] looked around at him with a funny questioning expression, like What’s up with you, buddy?  Blaze hardly noticed. Because the thing wasnow he was George. And that meant that a part of him wanted to—…


“If he went somewhere, George went somewhere, too. If he was George now, that only made sense. A leads to B, simple as can be…If he went, George went” (1, p. 171). Blaze reasons that when the baby is home alone, his George personality can’t hurt the baby.


The above is rather insightful for a “dummy.”


1. Stephen King (writing as Richard Bachman). Blaze [1973/2007]. New York, Gallery Books, 2018. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.