BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Friday, August 6, 2021

“Aurora Leigh” by Elizabeth Barrett Browning (post 3): A romantic comedy cliché that suggests Aurora has multiple personality


The Second Book of this novel is notable here for its romantic cliché—at least as old as the novels of Jane Austen—that a person may not realize she loves someone.


“For although I blushed indeed, as if I loved the man…I think I loved him not…” (1, p. 58).


Apparently, there is a difference of opinion between one of Aurora’s personalities who loves the man and another of her personalities who does not. This would be a symptom multiple personality.


1. Elizabeth Barrett Browning. Aurora Leigh [1856/1859]. Edited by Margaret Reynolds. A Norton Critical Edition. New York, W. W. Norton, 1996. 


Added Aug. 6: If Aurora were merely ambivalent, she would have said that she didn’t want to limit her life to the subordinate position and parental responsibilities of a wife, but instead wanted to be completely free to pursue her writing and poetry; however, she would have added, especially in view of her blush, she knew that she was, to some extent, aroused and attracted, and she had to admit, at least to herself, that she had mixed feelings.


In contrast, Aurora dismisses her blush as though it were some kind of meaningless reflex, and says that she has no feelings for him, period. Meanwhile, I suspect, she had an alternate personality who had blushed, because of feeling attracted. And this interpretation does not forget the context of what was discussed in prior posts.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.