BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Tuesday, August 10, 2021

“Intimacies” by Katie Kitamura: Front flap suggests multiple personality


The nameless protagonist, a first-person narrator, is a simultaneous translator for the international court at The Hague in the Netherlands. The front flap calls her “a woman of many languages and identities” (1), which inadvertently suggests a subtext of multiple personality.


Her namelessness, in and of itself, suggests multiple personality, because there is only one psychological circumstance in life where namelessness is not uncommon: alternate personalities in multiple personality.


The protagonist’s archenemy and antithesis is her lover’s, Adriaan’s, estranged wife, Gaby, who is criticized for having a single personality: “Gaby has always been herself, Adriaan said irritably” (1, p. 41).


In contrast, the protagonist saw “the prospect offered by a new relationship [as] the opportunity to be someone other than yourself” (1, p. 47).


She thinks of herself as having “parts,” a common euphemism for alternate personality: “A part of me was relieved” (1, pp. 76-77).


But sometimes “The thought was disquieting—that our identities should be so mutable” (1, p. 101).


Of course, men, too, may be mutable: “He appeared different in some way that I could not immediately identify, as if another version of himself were poking through the familiar exterior” (1, p. 220).


Comment

Since the author did not intend to raise the issue of multiple personality, its inadvertent presence in the subtext may reflect the author’s psychology.


1. Katie Kitamura. Intimacies. New York, Riverhead Books, 2021.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.