BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Tuesday, August 3, 2021

“The Year of Magical Thinking” by Joan Didion (post 7): Italics used for a comment by an alternate personality


Chapter 14 of this first-person memoir concludes with one sentence in italics:


“…I was not actually holding myself responsible. I was holding John [her late husband] and Quintana [her daughter] responsible, a significant difference but not one that took me anywhere I needed to be. For once in your life just let it go” (1, p. 174).


She does not write the last sentence in her own voice, which would have been: “For once in my life, I needed to just let it go”; or simply, “I needed to let it go.”


Instead, she abandons first-person and writes it as though another person were telling her what her attitude should be. And this other person speaks in italics.


I have cited the same thing in many past posts regarding the novels of many writers. It typically occurs in a dialogue or argument between a character and a voice in the character’s head.


Indeed, I have seen this so often, with so many different writers, that I consider it a literary convention: Novelists often use italics to indicate when one of a character’s alternate personalities is talking (although the novelist is probably not thinking of it in terms of multiple personality, per se).


1. Joan Didion. The Year of Magical Thinking [2005]. New York, Vintage International, 2007. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.